🔍 Observed Behavioral Pattern

Weaponizing Emergency Services: Jacob used 911 and allegedly (or someone in his party) made CPS reports in ways that appear retaliatory. Calling police for routine public travel, which officers repeatedly ruled as non-violations, suggests these calls were not genuine emergencies but means to pressure or intimidate.

Third-Party Harassment: Reports indicate Jacob might have used his family to bypass direct contact restrictions — an indirect way to sustain conflict while avoiding a direct PPO breach.

Maintaining Victim Narrative: Each call frames Jacob as feeling harassed — despite clear PPO language that he must avoid Alexandria. He portrays routine, legal activity as suspicious to build a harassment claim.

Disruption Tactic: The timing — around custody hearings — and allegedly (or someone in his party) CPS involvement strongly suggest an intent to disrupt Alexandria’s stability and credibility.

⚖️ Likely Alleged Intentions

To create a paper trail portraying Alexandria as a harasser, flipping the narrative of who is the protected party.

To cause legal or procedural friction — alleged CPS calls near hearings can create doubt about parental fitness.

To instill fear or intimidation — repeated police involvement, even when dismissed, drains the target emotionally and financially.

To test the PPO’s boundaries — by calling law enforcement, Jacob arguably tries to provoke Alexandria or catch her in technical violations, although the PPO is against him, not her.

🚨 Legal & Safety Implications

Police explicitly told Jacob:

• Driving by is not illegal.
• The PPO does not restrict Alexandria’s movements.
• Continuing baseless calls may be seen as misuse of emergency services.
• All reports are forwarded to the prosecutor for possible action.

Alexandria and her family have repeatedly documented feeling unsafe and harassed — not physically, but through systematic misuse of official channels.

✅ Key Takeaway

Jacob Cronick’s pattern of behavior — repeated 911 and alleged CPS (or someone in his party) calls about lawful activity — appears consistent with harassment-by-system, designed to retaliate, control, and exhaust Alexandria Parrotta. His alleged misuse of emergency channels could be argued as a form of PPO circumvention or contempt, depending on local enforcement.